Genetically Modified foods Persuasion Essay Essay

Many argon not aware of the ongoing debate of whether or not products in grocery stores across the country should label their products in a way to provide pick outr awareness regarding foods runing genetic ally special ingredients. genius statistic states, an estimated sixty to seventy percent of processed foods in grocery stores contain at least whizz genetically engineered ingredient (Byrne). This statistic reveals the prevalence of these ingredients lay down in grocery stores, yet the effects they flip on the products Americans consume can be proven very minor.throughout various studies and research on that point are countless reasons why labelling these foods can be viewed as unnecessary. Genetically-modified foods should not have to be labeled because of the complex unresolved issues regarding which foods should be labelled, the overpriced exists for the resources and technology required of labeling, and the fact that there are no significant differences between gen etically modified food and non-genetically modified food.While labelling might seem deal a simple process, it has umteen complex issues that need to be resolved in order to ready the necessary standards required to create a beneficial labelling system. What many do not realize is that in order to label these products effectively, we must mother standards that allow the labels to be equally and accu calculately distributed amongst all genetically modified foods. Certain questions must be answered, much(prenominal)(prenominal) as determining what parcel of genetically modified ingredients there are in a original product in order for it to be considered for a label.Debates over whether the fortune standards should be . 01% or 1% have been discussed, while other countries such as Japan have a minimum percentage rate of 5% (Byrne). In addition, the decision of labelling products produced from livestock that are fed genetically modified crops remains unanswered. This issue can be found remote due to the fact that there is no difference found in meat, egg, or dairy products derived from GM fed livestock and non-GM fed livestock.Overall, one can see that the idea of labeling genetically modified products is not simply difficult, but an extremely controversial and undefined process. Outside of the cost of study and ink for labelling, the technology required for the labelling of every GM food on the market would result in a significant price join on imposed on both the producer and consumer. An increased cost on food is an unnecessary expenditure that can easily be avoided if there simply was not a labeling policy that required producers to label genetically modified foods.These high be result from the extensive process of labelling that would have with the farmer and end with the retailer. This process would need to include very elaborated record-keeping and tests that would be required alongside producing the genetically modified foods. Other problems r egarding the cost of these labels include the willingness of consumers to buy products containing these ingredients and the increase of costs on these products from the new labelling. twain of these dilemmas result in a negative effect on the makers business and their respective products (Carter).All in all, the price increases and considerable costs of creating these special labels would create a negative economic match on both the buyer and seller. In addition to the unreasonable costs and logistical difficulties posed, the differences between the nutritionary content of genetically modified food and the nutritional content of conventionally derived foods are found to be minuscule. accomplished foods can be defined as the crops grown on farms such as corn or sugar using herbicides or pesticides.Throughout various tests on GM foods versus conventional foods, it has been proven that GM foods have no nutritional difference from conventional foods and do not vest any greater ef fect on human health (Lawrence).Furthermore, the FDA already requires foods that do possess a significantly different nutritional cheer due to modifications must provide labelling that exposes the nutritional changes. Examples of circumstances where these labels would be obligatory are when they contain certain allergens that consumers would not expect or a toxin that could be harmful when excessively consumed is present (Byrne).Labels on foods are utilize to notify consumers of when they are purchasing foods that are harmful to their health and genetically modified foods do not fall into that category. In short, placing these labels on all genetically modified foods is excessive due to the small differences they carry regarding their nutritional value and content. In conclusion, genetically modified foods should not have to be labeled to a certain degree because of the complex unresolved issues, the expensive costs for the resources and technology required for labeling, and the fact that there are no significant differences between genetically modified foods and conventional foods.These three primal points argue that labelling these modified foods would result in undesirable effects on our economy beginning with the producers and ending with the people consuming these foods. Allowing the public to be conscious of when they are consuming these particular products might seem like a reasonable proposition, but the negative outcomes tremendously outweigh the benefits. workings Cited Byrne, P. Labeling of Genetically Engineered Foods. Labeling of Genetically Engineered Foods. Colorado State University, Sept. 2010. Web. 16 Feb. 2014. Carter, C. A. , & Gruere, G. P. Mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods Does it really provide consumer choice?. AgBioForum, 68-70. Web. 16 Feb. 2014. Lawrence, Katherine. GM, Conventional & native Foods. GM, Conventional & Organic Foods. Plant Based Health, 30 Aug. 2010. Web. 16 Feb. 2014.