The Impossibility of Female Desire in Pygmalion and The Awakening Essay

In The Power of Discourse and the control of the Feminine, Luce Irigaray argues that, because society uses a hoary language that privileges male-gendered logic over effeminate-gender emotion, there is no adequate language to represent young-bearing(prenominal) propensity. She writes that feminine sport has to remain in enjoin in language, in its own language, if it is not to jeopardize the underpinnings of logical operations and, because of this, what is close strictly forbidden to women today is that they should blast to express their own pleasure (796). This inability to articulate female desire means that female desire becomes unutterable, something that cannot be expressed. According to Irigaray, this unutterable-ness of female desire in patriarchal language leaves only one option for women to set out to express their desire and that is the act of mimicry or mimesis. Mimesis is not an try to represent female desire in patriarchal language instead, mimesis is in attem pt through the use of patriarchal language to reveal that female desire cannot be presented, a way to make visible, by an substance of playful repetition, what was supposed to remain invisible the cover-up of a practical operation of the feminine in language (795). Mimesis exposes how patriarchal language disallows or denies female desire by circling around the absence of that female desire, by making its absence perfectly clear in a patriarchal discourse.The concept of a patriarchal discourse, necessary to Irigarays argument, is an example of a shared interpretive community, a term coined by Stanley Fish that refers to a discursively-created set of ideas, beliefs, and interpretations that belong to a community or multiple communities. The most important aspe... ...etative community of patriarchal language, does not allow for the existence of female desire and kills what little life it had in Eliza in these last lines. In the end, the characters of Edna and Eliza reveal the impo ssibility of female desire, of their having desire, within a culture that cannot articulate or name it.Works CitedChopin, Kate. The Awakening. Ed. Nancy Walker. Boston Bedford, 2000. Print.Fish, Stanley. How to Recognize a numbers When You See One. Is There a Text in this Class? The federal agency of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press, 1980. PDF File.Irigaray, Luce. The Power of Discourse and the Subordination of the Feminine. Literary conjecture An Anthology. By Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan. Malden, MA Blackwell Pub., 2004. Print.Shaw, George Bernard. Pygmalion. New York Dover Publications, 1994. Print.